Kate Bushell Murder - Was it a serial killer?

 

This is Kate Bushell, she was just 14 years old when she was savagely murdered

This is a tragic case that just has not received enough publicity and has possibly been stalled by certain theorists putting forward ideas and possible explanations that really make little or no sense. This has taken the public eye away from identifying genuine evidence as the theories suggest one man responsible for several murders, which is not necessarily true particularly in this particular matter. I will try to explain what I mean whilst covering the case. . .

Okay so let's take a quick look at the bones of the story

It was Saturday, November 15th, 1997, 14-year-old Kate Bushell had a lay in after a tough week at school then got up and headed into Exeter City centre to do some research for her homework then to do some shopping with her mum Suzanne. Kate and her family lived in the village of Exwick in Devon so Exeter was the nearest major shopping area for them, 

After completing her homework research Kate and her mum went to buy a CD by one of Kate's favourite bands and did some birthday shopping for her older brother's upcoming birthday. The weather had taken a decent break so they were able to enjoy their shopping, had it been the next day then the weather was much more rough and wet. They then returned home and Kate went to her room to complete her school homework. Kate was a very well thought of pupil at St Thomas High School and always did her work to a high standard. 

Kate was a dog lover and although she did not have one of her own she would often take care of and walk dogs for other people and Saturday 15th November 1997 was indeed one of those days. At 4.30pm Kate set out to walk a Jack Russell dog that belonged to neighbours, Stuart & Alison Smith who were on holiday at the time.

We know that Kate walked along Burrator Drive, which was the street in which she lived, then headed towards Exwick Lane. She and the dog Gemma continued past Exwick Heights Primary School and down into the lane. Kate had told her parents that she would be gone about 20 minutes but at 5pm they noticed she had not returned and as time continued they began to be concerned. It was winter so of course, it was dark before 5pm.

By 6.45pm the couple became very worried so dad Jerry set out to look for his daughter and Gemma the dog. He went around the estate to see if he could locate Kate but no luck so he decided it was time to call for help and thus returned home to call Devon & Cornwall Police. Whilst the police were on their way Jerry asked a neighbour if he could borrow a strong torch and headed out again to look for Kate whilst Suzanne stayed at home in case their daughter returned. 

Jerry carefully retraced what he believed would have been his daughter's route along Burrator Drive and into Exwick lane.  At 7.30pm Jerry walked along the lane, which by then was very dark and so shone the torch around the stile that leads into the entrance to the field where he knew Kate may well have chosen to have exercised the dog. The torchlight caught in the eyes of Gemma the dog and then landed on the lifeless body of Kate, I can only imagine that Jerry must have been absolutely devastated by the sight that met him. 

Kate's throat had been slashed deeply and the top half of her was covered in blood. Her Reebok jogging trousers had been pulled down to her knees but, rather strangely there was no evidence of any sexual assault, this leads me to three possible explanations:

1. Kate's attacker had planned on sexually assaulting her but had been disturbed and made off before the act could be completed, but I feel this the least likely.
2. The attacker had layed her that way deliberately as a mark of power to show the child had not only been savagely murdered but was very much vulnerable and in the power of the killer even after death. This in my opinion is the most likely of all scenarios.
3. Kate had been 'taken short' and had stopped to urinate when she was attacked, again not really that likely, but still not to be ruled out

The murder scene was literally only a few minute's walk from the Bushell family home in Burrator Drive and so it was suggested that it may well have been an opportunist crime, but I can honestly say I am not convinced on that. I believe that it is quite unlikely for a killer to have set out to just randomly grab and kill someone, particularly a young girl. I feel this was more than likely very much a premeditated killing and that the killer may well have known the planned movements of Kate on that tragic Saturday. 

You see this in my opinion is where the so-named 'professionals' sometimes misjudge and misread situations, which completely changes the route that the investigation then follows.  My point is that the lane and field in question are literally used by approximately 100 dog walkers every day and there tends to be a peak first thing in the morning and around 'tea time' before people settle down for evening meal. once again it is quite unlikely that 14-year-old Kate Bushell would have been alone for more than a few minutes so two questions immediately arise. . .

1. How come no one heard any screams or calls for help or indeed the dog barking and whining? This is a quiet village with housing very close by after all and dog walkers regularly passing along Exwick Lane
2. Why did it take until 7.30pm for Kate's body to be found? I do appreciate it was dark in winter but many dog walkers use torches and exercise dogs after evening meal before settling down for the night, Something here doesn't quite make sense.

"Yes, Yes, you always say that" I hear you say but, in my opinion, these points are very relevant and very much need to be carefully looked into. What time was Kate Bushell killed? Where was she killed? Did she, in fact, meet her end in that field entrance or was she placed there after death? 

Another question which I feel needs to be raised at this juncture is with regard to the dog, this dog stayed with Kate, is that really that likely, particularly as the dog was not hers? I would very much like to speak to an animal behaviour expert on this. I realise that the dog would probably have been on a lead but I am fairly sure that unless Kate had fixed the lead to herself in some way, the dog would easily have got free once Kate was dead. I do hope that this makes sense to you and regardless would have made a terrific fuss, after all the person walking it was murdered.

I am wondering whether the dog was temporarily silenced maybe a drugged piece of meat or something. unfortunately, there is no mention of this in reports.

There has been mention of a vehicle being seen near some stables in Exwick Lane at 4.50pm when a lady and her daughter were driving along. They saw the blue Vauxhall Astra van or estate car parked at the side of the road with a man looking into the rear of it, They also saw Kate with Gemma walking along the lane, but just 5 minutes later the man was nowhere to be seen and neither were Kate and the dog. The vehicle was still parked so it is perfectly possible that the man was at the stables or maybe in a field but interestingly no one has come forward for elimination.

The man that the pair saw was described as white, aged 30 to 40, medium build, collar-length dark hair, clean-shaven and was wearing jeans. Of course, this describes many men that were quite likely to be visiting stables and local fields but the concern is the man has never been identified, this, of course, is suggestive of possible involvement in Kate's demise.  It is certainly clear that the man would have been there at the boot of the vehicle when Kate and Gemma walked past, that is beyond doubt, but where did he vanish to so quickly? 

A separate witness gave a statement which is quite interesting in that a man was seen running along the field behind Normans cash and carry at between 5.10pm and 5.40pm, he was coming from the direction of the location Kate was later found dead. The report suggests that he was running 'out of control and very fast' down a muddy slippery hill, before turning back into the estate. He was not wearing jogging attire and was in an area where it would be unusual to see a jogger, particularly with it dropping dusk at that time of the year. Once again this man has never come forward for elimination so it is perfectly suggestive that he may have been the killer or at least involved in Kate's death but this is only supposition. The only doubt cast here is that the man ran into the estate of houses, he would almost certainly have been covered in blood and very muddy from running, he could easily have been identified and definitely noticed, so where did he go?

We obviously know Kate's route but it seems that something must have happened as according to the family she would not have normally turned off the road and into the darkened lane as it was well away from the road. There is certainly suggestion that something must have spooked her otherwise she would simply have walked along Exwick lane.

Now when forensic examinations were undertaken there were over 100 Orange clothing fibres found on Kate, these were completely alien to her and her home so they almost certainly must have come from the killer, but neither of the witness statements from the immediate time mention any Orange colours being visible, did the killer maybe have an orange sack of some kind that he or she originally planned to take Kate away in? Or was she killed somewhere then taken to the spot where her body was found? It is interesting that the forensic scientist indicated that the fibres were identified as quite unusual and may possibly have come from work-wear such as a boiler suit. I wonder if there have been local council workers or something similar such as road workers that have been supplied with this protective clothing? The fibres were not only found on Kate's clothing and body but on the stile where her body was found. 

One other line of inquiry that I would like to follow up in connection with the somewhat unusual Orange fibres is something of a shot in the dark but had anyone recently arrived in Devon from America? Either a convicted offender or maybe someone that had obtained a boiler suit similar to those worn by prisoners over there? I am going to follow my nose just a little and indulge my thought by trying to ascertain what kinds of materials are used in American prison boiler suits. If I come up with anything of interest I will of course post an update here.

So what other clues do we have about the killer? Well, it is fair to say that the killer must have been very strong and was cold and calculated enough to have brought the weapon of murder and taken it away again. You notice I do not say "he" as whilst there is every possibility that such a dreadful act would have been carried out by a male there is also the ever-present possibility that the perpetrator could have been a female. Is this why there was no evidence of sexual assault on Kate's body? Maybe the jogging pants being pulled down was a form of sexual arousal or empowerment? 

The very clear point is that it is highly probable that this offender will most likely have offended again, although not definite that is almost a certainty unless of course whoever was responsible was so disturbed by their actions that they maybe took their own lives since. It is almost certain that the offender will have committed crimes, probably of a violent nature prior to such a dreadful murder as this. Offenders rarely just commit a psychotic murder of this magnitude as a one-off or first offence, so maybe there is someone out there that had been the victim of violent assault? If so then you could be unwittingly hiding a killer's identity. 

Maybe someone had an idea at the time that he or she could have been in contact with Kate's killer but for one reason or another did not come forward? If that person is you do please get in touch with the police, remember it is never too late to do the right thing. A young girls' life was viciously and abruptly ended that November afternoon in 1997 and her family deserve justice. 

There have been some possible related cases that I will just skim over below but I personally do not see them as linked in any way except that the victims were all walking dogs when they were murdered. I may well post separate blogs on those killings, just to demonstrate the differences in killings. There are theories also about this being a killing by the serial killer Christopher Halliwell but having examined a lot of information and studied his behaviour I do not feel that he is in any way connected to the case. 

There is a writer / former policeman that is using cases like this to sell his books and stories which is a real shame because not only is it making money in book sales, the stories have little or no base and therefore this misleads the public so that if there was a question in someone's mind "hmmm I wonder of it was that person, I remember seeing him that day" it goes unreported because they read a story suggesting that dozens of murders were the responsibility of just one man. Sorry if this displeases some but I feel I have to get that out there. Crime investigation and solving come from gathering evidence, not looking at stories of other crimes, and simply saying "Well he did that one so it must be him that is responsible for so many more".

So let's look briefly at the other 'similar' murders. . .

Lyn Bryant

This lady was murdered whilst out walking her Lurcher dog on The Roseland Peninsula, near Truro in Cornwall on 20th October 1998.

Her body was found at around 2.40pm in the gateway to a field, she had been stabbed several times in the neck, throat, and back. Just bear in mind that Kate Bushell was killed by a single deep striking wound to her throat. 

Lyn was last seen at around 1.45pm outside the Ruan Methodist Chapel talking to a man described as in his 30s, around 5 feet 9 inches tall and dressed in light clothing. The field gateway where Lyn was discovered was just 100 yards from the chapel. 

A small curiosity, in this case, is that Lyn's glasses were found 6 months later, just a few feet from where her body had been found. Police think it is highly probable that the killer returned his trophy to the sight for some reason and in my personal opinion, this suggests that the killer was a local person, not a passing chancer from out of town. Lyn was aged 40 at the time of her death and had lived in the area all her life, she had two daughters and was a housewife, so no real motif for such a gruesome murder.

Helen Fleet

66-year-old Helen was strangled, beaten around the head, and stabbed approximately 10 times on March 28th, 1987. She had been out walking her dogs in Worlebury Woods near Weston Super Mare in Somerset when the brutal attack happened. 

No motive was ever established for the gruesome murder and the killer has never been identified. Once again a totally different and much more frenzied murder than that of Kate Bushell, in my opinion, a very different Modus Operandi.

Mrs. Fleet was also a local lady and lived not far from the murder scene with her younger sister Betty Brough. It is thought that Helen Fleet was just in the wrong place at the wrong time and the murder was not targeted to her in any way, I am not convinced but that is for a different blog on a different day.

Suffice to say that police believe Helen's killer to have been a local boy who had excellent knowledge of the woods and not connected to the serial killer, Christopher Halliwell, as suggested by a former policeman and writer Christopher Clark, he remains adamant that Helen was one of the first victims of Halliwell. Clark told local newspapers that the murder had stark resemblances to those of Kate Bushell and Lyn Bryant, I personally see little or no resemblance save for the facts the other victims were also walking dogs at the time they were killed.

That's all for this one, please do leave me a comment if you wish, and do please share my work as it brings these cases to the attention of the public again and may just help to see justice done, remember it is never too late to come forward if you think you can help

Please do contact Devon and Cornwall police on 101 or contact Crimestoppers on 0800 555 111 or via their website www.crimestoppers-uk.org

Points of interest:

(Not necessarily linked to the case)

Exwick is an historic manor parish a northwestern suburb of Exeter and has an Eastern boundary of the River Exe which is where the village takes its name. The village played a very important part in milling as it is located on the floodplain of the river 

There are several large houses in Exwick including Cleve House which became a training centre for guide dogs for the blind in the 1950s, it later was made into smaller houses and the site of a new primary school. 

One of the most famous names in Exwick history was that of William Gibbs who paid to make Exwick a separate parish from St Thomas and extended the chapel of ease into a full church of St. Andrews.

November 15th was the 319th day of the year in 1997 in the Gregorian calendar  

 

Genette Tate - Unsolved

 

Genette Tate vanished from her home village age 13 years, she has never been found

On August 19th 1978 a 13-year-old girl simply vanished whilst she was doing her regular paper round delivering the Exeter Express & Echo. It is now 42 years since Genette Tate disappeared and her father has recently passed away without knowing what truly happened to his little girl. As a parent, I can only begin to imagine how dreadful that must have felt. 

So let's look at the story then draw some thoughts as we go along. . .

Genette lived in the historic village of Aylesbeare, approximately 8 miles east of the city of Exeter in Devon UK. The village dates back to at least the 13th century and is by all accounts a very peaceful and pleasant area to live in. The village has a somewhat mixed population of farmers, retired and commuter families within it, it is very small and even today if you drive in one end you will be out the other end in less than 2 minutes. Once the M5 Motorway was opened in 1975 the village was just a field or two away from national road links, so a possible way for the killer to enter Aylesbeare, abduct Genette and leave just as fast.

Genette had been born in the Somerset town of Taunton but she had moved with her family into Cornwall, then on to Aylesbeare. Her mother and father had divorced and Genette was living with her dad, his partner Violet and her daughter Tania. 

The teenager's family had nicknamed her 'Ginny' and she had an amazing ability with mathematics and had a great curiosity about the world, all in all, a pretty smart girl it seems. She was a keen little worker and was doing holiday relief paper rounds on the day that she disappeared. She had left home at around 2pm, cycled through the village and met the newspaper van on the A3052 (the main Exeter to Sidmouth road) outside The White Horse Pub at around 2.50pm, something which she had done each day for the past week, as she was the relief paper girl. 19th August 1978 was to have been Genette's last day doing the round as the regular paper girl was due back.

Okay so let me pause there for just a minute and explore the last couple of sentences. . . Genette was doing a temporary job so, does this suggest that this was very much a random abduction or was it planned? I would say that I feel something like that is more likely to have been planned as opposed to just a random kidnapping. why do I say this? Well, let's think about the setting, a very rural, quiet village where I imagine pretty much everybody knew one another so abducting a young girl that could well make an awful lot of noise, struggle and may even get away and raise the alarm could be extremely risky. The only consideration here is that there is no telling what goes on in an evil monster's mind, would someone just take pot luck, a random chance abduction? Could the real target have been the regular paper girl that was away on summer holiday? 

Moving on. . .

Okay so Genette collected her papers and began her round delivering some fourteen papers before she met up with two local friends, Margaret Heavey and Tracey Pratt around 3.15pm, they chatted and walked slowly with Genette up a slight incline in the road heading back into the village. Once they reached the peak of the incline Genette took to her bike once more and rode ahead to continue her deliveries, she remained in the girl's sight for around 50 metres then took a curve in the road. Just about five or so minutes later the Tracey and Margaret came across Genette's bike, on the road with the newspapers all tipped out of the cycle's basket, there was no sign of Genette at all. 

Now once again I draw your thoughts to the abduction, Margaret and Tracey were only a matter of minutes behind Genette yet she had vanished, suggesting that the abductor must have acted very, very fast. He or she must have really taken a massive risk as the girls or indeed anyone else from the village could have come along at any moment, was the kidnapper working alone? Was there any force, was Genette maybe gagged or in someway stunned to silence her? It was suggested by one writer that a large van was used, considering the noise and the way such a vehicle would have stood out in such a surrounding that seems extremely unlikely, So what did happen to Genette Tate? We may never know.

The two girls began to call Genette's name out and looked over hedges and into gateways but there was no sign of the teenager. They walked on, pushing Genette's bike until they reached John Tate, he said: "Genette's friends came up the road to tell me that they couldn't find her, so I joined them and we headed back along the road to the lane where they had last seen her". "We were all looking for her by then jumping over hedges, shouting her name but to no avail, quite soon after that Violet said 'John I think we should call the police' ".

This was to be the start of one of the longest and biggest missing person searches ever launched by Devon and Cornwall police. The response by the police was prompt and well operated, within two hours of the report being made they had a helicopter from the RAF search and rescue team in the air and there were uniformed police all over the village. I can only imagine the dreadful fears held by John and Violet as they watched things unfold before their eyes. The couple spent the evening and many evenings after that searching the lanes and fields for Genette, but with no luck, Genette had literally 'vanished into thin air'.

The police officer in charge of the investigation was Detective superintendent Eric Rundle, he had no clues, no leads to go on. he was a highly experienced police officer and the second most senior detective on the Devon and Cornwall police force at that time. He had a team of officers working under him, which he divided into teams to search in particular areas. His job must have been extremely difficult as he had no witnesses, no sightings or reports of anything suspicious. There were so many questions; had Genette had some kind of accident? Had she been the victim of a robbery? Had she been abducted, if so why? The possibilities were endless but all just had no starting point, the most obvious hypothesis was that she had been abducted and taken away somewhere and based on that Eric Rundle would have been extremely aware of just how crucial time is in such cases if there is a chance of finding a victim alive.

It was said by a police officer working on the case that one disappointing thing was Margaret and Tracey had moved Genette's bike which could have given some clue or guidance to a trained eye, "the scene had been tampered with before the job got going".

The police commandeered the village hall as a form of operational centre and issued a description of Genette as 'boyish, 5ft tall with close style brown hair, suntanned wearing a white t-shirt with her name embroidered on its left shoulder. Her dad recalled her as very young-looking still very much a child but, interestingly some others from the village described her as maturing fast and very much a developing young woman. This, of course, has no obvious relevance to the case as far as I am able to ascertain but the description difference could bear importance as well as the way in which the missing girl was thought of and in how investigators understand the girl that apparently just vanished. 

Very early in the investigation police realised that they needed help from the full force of the media to get Genette's face on the pages of papers and Television screens all over the UK. They called a press conference and staged photographs of the teenager's bicycle abandoned in the road and for a whole month after the disappearance, the publication which Genette had been delivering ran stories with a photograph of her on their front page every day. 

On Monday 21st August just two days after the disappearance the headline on the Express and Echo ran 'Echo newsgirl vanishes'. They encouraged more than 8,000 people to gather just a week after Genette went missing to search the local common just on the outskirts of Aylesbeare known as Woodbury Common. The media dubbed the searchers 'Genette's army' as they set themselves into groups and tramped across the vast common searching for any clue that might lead to the missing girl being found. Worryingly it has since been admitted that there was actually no operational reason to scour the common but nonetheless it was done. 

The family were becoming increasingly desperate with every day that passed and this lead to many theories being put forward from all walks of life including paranormal investigators and mystics of all kinds including some conspiracy theorists (a pet hate of mine) but unfortunately, it seems Devon and Cornwall police were keen to listen to almost every theory suggested, maybe not the best practice but things were pretty desperate in so many ways, so every bit of publicity in a difficult case such as this really could have made a difference. 

Sadly as time wore on with no new leads and literally nothing at all to suggest what had truly happened to Genette eventually things began to wind down, The police gave the village hall back and the press headed off to find their next story. No sign of Genette, no one coming forward with credible information finally lead to the case becoming somewhat cold and enquiries being scaled back. 

In 1990 a killer was arrested for child abduction in the Scottish Highlands, he was Robert Black. He had a very shady past and had all the stereotypical identities of a predatory paedophile. He had a very bad childhood and moved down into England in 1968. He passed his driving test in 1976 and took a job as a poster delivery driver which gave him a reason to travel the highways and motorways with his work and could by all accounts literally turn up 'anywhere in the UK'. 

According to records Black's method of abducting children was to leave the major roads and head into rural settings such as Aylesbeare, abduct a child and vanish again without anyone even noticing him, so a theory was suggested that Genette Tate was a victim of Black but I don't feel that to be the case. 

In 1994 Roger Black was tried and convicted of the abduction, rape and murder of three girls during the 1980s and he was sentenced to life in prison. His victims were Susan Maxwell, aged 11 whom he sexually abused and murdered on July 30th 1982, he drove her body some 264 miles to dump her. Caroline Hogg aged just 5 was abducted on July 8th 1983 and her body found 310 miles away from her home and Sarah Harper aged 10 was abducted on March 26th 1986 from Leeds with her body found some 71 miles away. 

Devon and Cornwall Police interviewed Roger Black at length but he did not give anything away and was never charged but still remained a firm suspect in the Genette Tate disappearance. I personally am not convinced that he had any connection and neither was John Tate, Genette's father. Just remember this; all the other bodies were found, Genette's was not and whilst this may be just unfortunate I think it changes the hypothesis surrounding Black as an abductor.

In 2007 the police submitted a file to the Crown Prosecution Service with a view to charging Black in connection with Genette Tate's disappearance but the CPS were unable to find sufficient evidence to proceed. There was a little more hope in Black being further pursued after he was charged and convicted of yet another abduction and murder in 2011, that of Jennifer Cardy aged 9 abducted on 12th August 1981, Black had grabbed her whilst she was cycling to a friend's house. 

There is some evidence relating to Genette Tate's case in that a witness saw Black at Exeter Airport "acting suspiciously" on 19th August 1978 and the existence of a fuel receipt puts Black in the South West of England around the date of Genette's disappearance but it is not known how close to Aylesbeare he actually was. 

Whilst I accept these small pieces of evidence may be suggestive of Black taking Genette it is very much assumed based purely on other crimes he had committed and I am not at all convinced, I firmly believe that the person responsible for Genette's disappearance was from much closer to home but this is very much my own opinion. 

Black has been suggested as a relevant name / possible suspect in over a dozen child abduction cases in both the UK and into Europe but to be fair most "serial killers" will always be put forward for many crimes because they have been responsible for something similar. After all look at Christopher Halliwell, I have recently been made aware of a person writing on Facebook suggesting that he was responsible for 27 or more abductions and murders, but many can easily be debunked as nothing to do with him either.

Nobody knows for certain what happened on the afternoon of 19th August 1978 in Withen Lane Aylesbeare. Some are convinced that Robert Black was responsible for the vanishing of Genette Tate but many others are equally not convinced at all. Due to the passage of time and many theories combined with misinformation the stories and amateur sleuths, it seems unlikely we will ever get to the truth now, but we must never give up hope. 

There have been many suggestions of paedophilic activity in and around the village, occult crimes and more but I personally don't feel these "suggestions" are that far from the truth after all, but I don't want to be seen as too suggestive. I will, however, add just one point taken from a news article published by Devon Live which reads "The only lane leading off the main road is called Withen Lane, about 100 metres from the centre of Aylesbeare and within sight of the ancient church turret" think carefully about that. 

The village itself dates back to The Domesday Book and is itself very rural with lots of farmland. I won't dwell on these points but I feel that this information is important when studying the case in any depth, I could, of course, be 'barking up the wrong tree' so to speak. 

I will just close by saying that Genette Tate's father John went to his grave not knowing what happened to his precious daughter but he was absolutely adamant that Robert Black was not the man responsible for the disappearance. John Tate said that Devon and Cornwall Police had Black's name in the frame but purely based on his past not even any circumstantial evidence exists, that is made clear by the fact that as I mentioned previously the CPS would not prosecute as there was insufficient evidence. 

The disappearance of Genette Tate is a tragic and confusing case whist being of huge interest to true crime researchers such as myself. I do hope that one day there will be some answers and we may get to know what happened to Genette as she and her family still left behind deserve justice. 

Here below are some useful links with regard to this case. . .

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-devon-52697413

https://youtu.be/mat8SCRyb1I

https://janmeecham.wordpress.com/2019/05/13/into-thin-air/

Missing Linda Razzell - Murdered or Vanished

This case has bugged me for quite a long time so having recently studied some material on Christopher Halliwell, a serial killer, thought by some to be a suspect in the case and watched a documentary about Linda's husband Glyn, who was convicted of her murder (despite there being no body found) I thought I would post on this one before I write about Halliwell as a blog.

Before I get into this blog I want to say that something about this story just doesn't sit right with me and that is why I am considering the possibility of producing a documentary on the case. There has already been a couple broadcast but it is my opinion that due to the way they were put together very little new information has been forthcoming. 

The biggest issue with the documentaries concerned has been that they have mainly targeted the story of Mr Razzell's innocence and not really studied Linda Razzell's disappearance. The makers of documentaries, in this case, have decided to follow the news media and assume that because Glyn Razzell is serving a life sentence for the murder of his estranged wife that she must, in fact, be dead, well I don't really buy it. One of the documentaries examined Glyn Razzell's case with a view to trying to appeal his conviction so once again appealed to only a relatively small audience. Bearing in mind that it has been well publicised that a person was convicted of Linda Razzell's murder many people have taken their eyes off the ball so to speak.

I am sure there are people out there that may well have seen something or may remember something that sticks in their mind about the day in question but kind of dismissed it as Glyn Razzell is serving a prison sentence for a murder so "That must be what happened". well not necessarily.

Read on and I will try to bring all the details as well as explain my reasoning as to why I do not necessarily believe Linda Razzell to be dead. . .

Linda Razzell was 41 years old at the time of her disappearance. She lived in Highworth on the outskirts of Swindon and disappeared on her way to work on Tuesday 19th March 2002. Linda left home with her children at approximately 8.40am in her red Ford Escort and drove 7 miles into Swindon to work, dropping the children at school and her boyfriend at his work on the way. She parked her car in a residential street, Alvescott Road and set off to walk an approximately 20-minute journey to the nearby college where she was a teaching assistant, but she never arrived and has never been seen again. 

Mother of four Linda was married but in the process of getting divorced. Her estranged husband. Glyn Razzell had recently been made redundant from his job in finance. Linda had become unhappy in her marriage and started an affair with a man that had been working on an extension to the family home. As a result Glyn also spread his wings so to speak and found himself a lover. Linda and Glyn separated in August 2000 and Glyn left the family home. The affair with the builder didn't last and Linda moved on to a new boyfriend Greg Worrall.

According to friends of Glyn & Linda, the divorce negotiations became pretty ugly and Glyn stood to face a huge financial loss. Just a few days prior to Linda's disappearance she was granted a court order that saw a freeze put on her estranged husband's personal bank accounts, which lead to Glyn changing his plans for a French "booze cruise" at short notice in order that he could work with his solicitor to get that problem resolved.

You may well think, here is the motive for Glyn Razzell to murder his wife before she destroyed him altogether but I will explain reasons why that doesn't seem quite as simple as we may think, so do read on. . .

OK so as I just mentioned, on the morning of Linda's disappearance her husband Glyn had been scheduled to go on a booze cruise with some friends to France, but those plans fell through at short notice as he had to swear an affidavit with his solicitor in connection with the divorce. As a result, he loaned his car to his friends due to its size and capacity (it was a Ford Galaxy people carrier) and agreed to use their Renault Laguna whilst they were away. As he found himself at something of a loose end early that Tuesday morning he decided to go for a long walk and do some thinking.

He took a brief telephone call from his girlfriend at 8.24am then went on his way, leaving the Laguna in his driveway and apparently unaware of any problem with Linda. Glyn was not made aware of the fact Linda had not reported for work that day until around 5pm that day when a missing person report was filed. 

This is where things take a bit of a twist as we can be absolutely certain that the time of the telephone call received by Glyn on his home 'landline' telephone is accurate and therefore he could not have driven across Swindon in rush hour traffic in time to have reached Linda in time. Now add to that the confirmed fact that Linda left home later than normal on that particular day as one of her children had forgotten their homework and had to go back into the house for it, of course, there was no way Glyn would have known that. Further to this Linda had only started parking in the street where she was last seen since her separation from Glyn due to the cost of parking being expensive and her struggling financially, none of these facts were known to her estranged husband. Even if he had managed to drive across Swindon in time, he would have gone to her old parking area and not found Linda or her car.

So this information rules him out, right? Wrong as none of it could be absolutely proved. 

I am not overly familiar with the layout of Swindon but I have been reliably informed that Alvescott Road was a good 20 - 25-minute walk from the college where Linda worked, so why park so far away? Maybe it truly was the nearest area where she could park her car for free but it must have proved a problem in bad weather. Apparently, her routine seems to suggest that she would normally arrive in Alvescott Road around 0850 and reach the college at approximately 0915. According to the children and Greg Worrall, Linda had left home late that day so even her own routine was changed.

On the day before her disappearance, Linda had visited 3 separate banks, with her boyfriend and had made cash withdrawals at each one. A little indicative of something unusual in my opinion particularly as she was experiencing a lot of financial hardship so would have been short of funds as it was. The bank visits and withdrawals suggest to me that she was planning a particular use of the cash and that could well have been to go away with. Her bank visits and withdrawals were confirmed by CCTV yet Wiltshire police seem to not take much consideration or relevance of this. In my opinion, this bears great importance to the investigation.

One very curious and somewhat indicative occurrence on the day before Linda disappeared was that she visited Glyn's bank where she claimed that she wanted to pay money in. Of course, she knew that his accounts had been frozen. but nonetheless managed to obtain information by deception, Not only was this borderline illegal, it was quite an odd thing to do as she had been separated from Glyn for some 19 months and was almost divorced. The process was nearing its end and the divorce was due to be completed within a matter of weeks. 

Bearing all this in mind combined with the fact that Linda already had possession of the family home she had no legitimate reason to go to Glyn's bank and as far as I can ascertain it was not something that she had done before. I do wonder what she had hoped to do with any information gleaned from her actions that day and I feel it demonstrates that Linda was behaving somewhat irrationally. So what was behind that visit to Glyn's bank? What did Linda gain from it? Questions that we may never get a definitive answer to, certainly not unless we find Linda alive.

Linda was apparently quite a hot-headed woman that became flustered and angry quite quickly and was often seen to be stressed, yet statements from her children suggest that on the morning of her disappearance she was much calmer than usual and when she dropped the children off she would always say "see you at five". On this occasion, the children say that on that last journey with them when they reached school Linda simply said goodbye. 

Now it is perfectly reasonable to say that she knew they were running late so she just said "goodbye" so that she get on her way to work, but when a routine is in place it seems a little strange to change a parting comment like that. I know as a child my mum always said "see you tonight" whether she was dropping us at school or we were walking or riding away up the drive if she had suddenly said something different I would have been surprised and concerned. 

The next points that seem suggestive that Linda Razzell may have been planning to vanish on 19th March 2002 are that firstly she had 2 mobile telephones, 1 for every day and work use and 1 which she always carried which was specifically used for her children to contact her in an emergency, a phone which she left switched on even at work. On the day in question, Linda did not take that mobile with her, in fact, it was found in a drawer at home, switched off. 

Secondly, Linda had been issued with an identity badge which she had to wear at work, this was also in the drawer at home. Now surely it is reasonable to suggest that she would have had both the phone and badge in her handbag as she knew she was going to work and would need both with her. I can see a possible but somewhat unlikely explanation that she was running late on the morning of March 19th and absent-minded left them behind but my thinking is; why were such important items in the drawer? Surely during weekdays, those things would remain in Linda's handbag? A little strange in my thinking to suggest that every evening she would remove them from her bag or pocket, place them into a drawer, only to get them out again the very next morning, knowing that they were important and needed every day. I know we all do things differently but this really sticks with me as just a little strange.

Curiously the calendar at Linda's home had been marked with a ? question mark on the date of 19th March 2002, that seems a little indicative that she had something that she was at least considering doing on that date. The children and Greg Worrall had no explanation for the marking so obviously, Linda put it there, but why I guess we may never know unless we find Linda Razzell. 

I can only surmise that she had something that she had been considering for that day and the question mark was asking her shall I do that or not? Maybe something on the lines of "do I go"? or "am I ready to go"? " have I got everything ready to leave"?  These are of course only assumptions and could not really be seen as stand-alone strong evidence in an enquiry, but combined with other markers it's just another thing to add to a list of indicators that Linda Razzell planned her own disappearance.

I have had it suggested to me that Linda not only planned to disappear but as part of this she would frame her estranged husband for her murder as she knew with enough circumstantial evidence he could be convicted without her body necessarily being found. These are after all the actions of a lady with various mental health problems since the 1970s and which had reportedly started to return prior to her vanishing. Linda's children reported that she had been upset a lot more and would often go off alone and would not want them with her or want their cuddles. It was discovered that she had been prescribed anti-depressant medication but she had not been taking it leading up her disappearance.

An analysis of Linda's home PC turned up that there had very recently been internet searches for cheap flights to French-speaking countries, again not necessarily relevant but this combined with the fact that Linda spoke French fluently, loved holidays to France and she had lived in France for a year during her life. The fact that she vanished without a trace after these searches is a little more than suggestive of something that should in my opinion have been looked at much more closely. 

Add to this information that Linda was good friends with a couple of which the husband had worked on projects in the French-speaking country of Burundi and Linda had helped with his understanding the language. Further to that, a pad of Linda's was found with the address of the official residence of the ambassador of Burundi written on it. This could have of course been because she had helped her friend out that had worked there but again this potential lead indicator should be examined and given more consideration.

Now I come to a particular point which I firmly believe to be very, very suggestive and concerning. Linda Razzell was an avid reader, particularly of crime novels and prior to her disappearance, she had been reading Trial & Retribution 3, which she had read almost three-quarters of the way through. The book features details of the methods used by police during murder investigations and the plot of the story features a body in a boot of a car and planting of evidence in order to frame someone for murder. 

Is it just me or is this relevant and indicative of something a little suspicious? After all, let's bear in mind that Linda was very bitter towards and held something of a grudge against her estranged husband Glyn. The fact that one of the main pieces of "evidence" relied upon by the prosecution at Glyn Razzell's trial was bloodstains found mainly in the boot of the car.

So on that note let's return to Glyn Razzell and his potential involvement in Linda's disappearance and mysterious murder. . .

Now in order for Glyn Razzell to have got across town to meet and abduct Linda in that Tuesday morning, he would have had to pass some 25 traffic cameras on the way and despite the police examining all of them, there was no sign of the Renault Laguna or indeed Glyn Razzell. There is no alternative route from Glyn's home to the area where Linda parked her car so that should have ruled him out as a suspect but it did not. He would have had to have left home no later than 0820 in order to get to Alvescott Road in time but in fact, he was on the telephone on his home landline until approximately 0826 talking with his girlfriend.

I am not here to debate whether Glyn Razzell is guilty of his wife's abduction and possible murder but I will look at as much evidence as I can to try to draw a conclusion as to where Linda Razzell is and if indeed she was murdered and by whom. 

I will explain further in I do not agree with the supposition that serial killer Christopher Halliwell had anything to do with the matter. I do see some possibilities but I am aware that an organisation called Inside Justice recently examined the disappearance and were unable to establish any links to the killer either. 

Louise shorter CEO of Inside Justice and her team interviewed many people including the building contractors that undertook the extension building work on the Razzell's home but there was nothing to suggest that Christopher Halliwell ever worked on the property despite false media reports suggesting that he did, even suggesting that he was the man that Linda had an affair with is not the case as far as can be ascertained. 

Linda's boyfriend at the time of her disappearance was not the man with whom she had the affair with during the building work in the family home but there is still no evidence to link the building work on Razzell's house, an affair with Linda or even to suggest that Linda and Christopher knew one another.

As far as I am able to establish Christopher Halliwell was, in fact, making his living pretty much full time as a taxi driver at the time that Mrs Razzell vanished. 

There are indications that Halliwell may well have been actively killing in 2002 there have so far been no crimes actually linked with solid evidence to him and that includes the disappearance of Linda Razzell. We cannot even suggest that she was abducted in Halliwell's taxi as Linda parked her own car in Alvescott Road and as far as I am able to understand there is no record of her using taxi services.

There is a brief mention of a beige coloured car being parked in Alvescott Road, near to where Linda parked and a man was apparently sitting in the driver's seat. I am not currently able to find any evidence of this being considered during the investigation into Linda's disappearance nor anything to particularly suggest that there may have been any reason to think anything was particularly suspicious.

Let's come back to the story so far as Glyn Razzell's conviction for his wife's murder is concerned. . .

According to other corroborating evidence Linda suffered from varying degrees of mental health problems and as the divorce from Glyn became more protracted and bitter she made allegations that on at least two occasions her husband had physically assaulted her. In both cases, Glyn was acquitted at trial by jury and the cases closed. 

Now the relevant points need to be examined: 

• Some 16 hours after Linda disappeared Wiltshire police went to Glyn's home to ask him some questions about the matter, during which time they examined his car.
• Glyn volunteered information to the police by telling them that he had in fact driven a different vehicle that day and advised them as to where the Laguna was, surely if he had something to hide he would have simply allowed them to examine his own car knowing that it had been in France on the day in question. 
• The police then examined the Renault Laguna but found nothing indicative to suggest Linda may have been in the vehicle either being abducted or otherwise on TWO occasions, only after it had been returned twice to its owner in a filthy state covered in forensic powders and the owner had thoroughly cleaned it inside and out was it then taken away again, examined and large amounts of blood splashes found that were found to belong to Linda, hmmm something wrong there me thinks.
• Interestingly there were no hairs, DNA, skin flakes, etc connected to Linda in the car at all and as far as I can establish there was nothing found on Glyn's clothes either.
• An eyewitness that knew both Linda Razzell and her boyfriend states that she saw Linda's boyfriend sitting on a wall in Queen's Park in Swindon at 0930 on Tuesday 19th March 2020. This park is close to Alvescott Road where Linda parked her car and she would have normally walked through that park on the way to work.
• Linda's boyfriend Greg had been monitoring Glyn's movements for some two weeks leading up to Linda's disappearance and this is confirmed by a statement from Glyn Razzell's neighbour saying that Greg Worrall had been asking her questions about Glyn and his movements. Apparently, Greg Worrall had knocked on her door assuming it was Glyn's house and enquired if Glyn still lived there, this behaviour has never been explained
• Very interestingly when Greg was interviewed by the police on 20th March 2002 he somehow knew that Glyn had been using the Renault Laguna on 19th March and told the police so. Once again it seems rather suspicious that the police did not seem to consider this as odd or indeed raise any question as to how and why a man that was in no way connected to Glyn knew such information or indeed why.
• Mobile telephone records clearly indicate that Greg Worrall was not where he claimed to be on the day that Linda disappeared. There are at least 3 occasions where mobile telephone masts indicated that they had identified the phone in use in their coverage area yet he had claimed to be elsewhere at those times. Worrall was never cross-examined about this despite clear cell site analysis from his phone confirming him to be a liar, why is this I ask myself?
• Now the prosecution did not pursue this or find it suspicious, yet when it was mentioned that Glyn Razzell's mobile phone was switched off at the time that Linda went missing they submitted this to the trial jury as very suspicious, why is that? See why I feel things really do not add up?
• One more very important point is that Linda Razzell reported allegations on two separate occasions that her husband had violently attacked her. On both times Glyn Razzell was acquitted at trial. He did admit to the team of Inside Justice that there had been a violent incident once during his marriage which had got a little out of hand but he fully admitted that and never attempted to hide anything.
• Linda's mobile phone was found in the alleyway where it has been suggested she was abducted from and police say that the phone had fallen out of Linda's bag in the struggle when she was abducted. The problem with this is that the phone received a number of calls on Tuesday 19th March 2002 from people trying to find Linda but one particular stands out as at 2215 on the night of 19th March a phone mast over a mile away from where the phone was found picked up a call to Linda's phone. According to expert witnesses, this mast could NOT have received the signal from where the phone was located. 
• The phone was found under a plank of wood suggesting that it was planted there, this, in my opinion, is backed up by the fact Greg Worrall was seen in Alvescott Road "checking to see if Linda's car was still there" that same night and the phone was found the next morning 20th March 2002.
• It is even more indicative of foul play when we consider that there had been a heavy police presence in the said alleyway during that Tuesday yet the phone had not been spotted but surprisingly it was found the very next morning. So was it planted there sometime after 2215 on Tuesday night? I think it is highly likely yes, is the answer to that question.
• The Renault Laguna was forensically examined on 3 separate occasions, the first two found nothing, yet the third time a large quantity of blood staining was found around the boot area of the car but rather surprisingly NONE was found on any of the driving controls or doors of the vehicle, not even the boot lip.

I think I have covered pretty much every angle of this story, suffice to say I do not believe that Linda Razzell is dead, there is very little evidence to suggest that she is. Some would say her bank accounts and finances have not been used since, but it was quite simple in 2002 to vanish and assume another identity, all the more so in a foreign country like Burundi for example. To be fair the old adage is true "If a person does not want to be found, even the best detective will struggle to locate them"

There have been witnesses that have claimed to see Linda Razzell since her disappearance including a lady that was a long term friend of Linda's and knew her very well who claimed that she had seen her driving in a silver Ford Fiesta on the day after she vanished and that Linda had appeared very angry that the woman had seen her and that the witness attempted to make contact by waving. The police refused to accept this witness story and even set about trying to find the Ford Fiesta but despite 70 vehicles being checked the car was not traced. I do believe this witness to be correct and she DID Linda the day AFTER she disappeared.

So has Glyn Razzell served 17 years in prison for a murder that he did not commit? Yes in my opinion he quite likely has done.

Was Linda abducted and murdered on Tuesday 19th March 2002? In my opinion, no I doubt it

Was Linda murdered by Christopher Halliwell or did she even know him? No in my opinion and based on researched evidence that is very unlikely.

Is Linda Razzell still alive and living a life as someone else? Yes, in my opinion, I think that is highly likely

Did Linda Razzell and her boyfriend possibly frame Glyn Razzell for her murder? In all honesty, I don't know at this stage, but I would not be at all surprised

Please leave me a comment and let me know your thoughts on this and of course, watch out for updates

https://glynrazzell.org.uk/

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/may/04/ukcrime.features11

https://insidetime.org/the-case-of-glyn-razzell/

Documentary: During the time that I have been researching and writing this blog an independent TV company have replied to me with a view to making a documentary; so I now begin the process of contacting relevant people, conducting interviews and preparing a script. I shall, of course, keep you updated as time passes.

Glyn Razzell and his new partner Rachel Smith 

Linda Razzell and her boyfriend Greg Worrall

 

Ann Heron - Unsolved murder 30th anniversary

August 3rd 2020 marks the 30th anniversary of the tragic murder of Ann heron in the outskirts of Darlington, in County Durham in the North of England. The murder that became known as  'The bikini murder'  has to this day never been solved, but a death investigator Jen Jarvie believes that she could possibly have identified the killer or at least the guy seen driving away from the scene in a blue car at the approximate time of the killing.

Ann Heron's murder which took place on the hottest day of 1990 remains the only unsolved murder to remain unsolved in the last 70 years so I can only imagine that it must be quite a thorn in the side for that area's police. 

Mrs Heron was 44 years old and mum to three when she met her tragic end to an unknown murderer and her husband has been shrouded in suspicion. He was arrested and charged with Ann's murder in 2005 but all the charges were dropped and the case against him was abruptly discontinued after just 12 weeks. Sadly because no other suspect has been forthcoming and the murder has not been solved the 85 year old widower's name has never been fully cleared of suspicion.

Now, I have recently read quite a lot of material written about this case suggesting that the killer may be Christopher Halliwell, which in my opinion takes the focus away from the search for the real assailant. I am not an expert but, I really am frustrated to see people that claim to have a "high level of expertise" in criminal investigation writing books and articles simply suggesting one man's name for about 30 murders up and down the UK.

Sorry I digress. . .

So it seems that a dangerous criminal Michael Benson was on the run from prison where he had been serving a life sentence for violent crimes. Jen Jarvie has been working closely with the family of the late Ann for over 4 years now has said that she firmly believes that Benson should at least be considered as a serious suspect in the murder. Mrs Jarvie said "Benson has not been a suspect in the investigation throughout it's 30 year history and she believes he should be considered as a suspect". 

Jen Jarvie went on to say "after 30 long years, the family needs conclusion. These are people's lives that we are dealing with. It is cruel, it is inhumane to keep them hanging".

3rd August 2020 sees the 30th anniversary in this unsolved case and it is in my mind high time that this case was investigated from a new angle, take away the automatic assumption that "Halliwell is responsible" and look more carefully at the information that we have available to us.

Ann Heron is thought to have been sunbathing in a fairly secluded garden at her somewhat isolated  home and may well have been observed over a hedge. She was wearing her bikini and enjoying a very hot day, the hottest in the North East of England since records began in the 1930s. At  1645 hrs a blue car, possibly a Ford Sierra or Vauxhall Astra was seen parked outside Ann's home, Aeolian House, Middleton St George and at 1705 hrs a blue car was seen speeding down the 50 yard driveway and away in a westerly direction along the A66, having cut sharply across the A67, overtook a taxi and sped away. 

The driver of the car was described as Heavily tanned possibly of  a Mediterranean appearance with hair longer at the sides, aged between 35 to 45 years old. Unfortunately neither of the witnesses managed to get even a partial index for the vehicle and despite intense enquiries it was never found. It is quite clear that the vehicle and it's driver need to be identified but of course time has passed, the car has probably long since been scrapped and the driver will have changed considerably. If a witness comes forward they will need to be sure that the person they identify is the right one, but having said that no one must be put off. If anyone knows any information relating to that fateful day 3rd august 1990 particularly between abut 1630 hrs and 1710 hrs they really need to come forward and speak up.

The late Ann Heron's widower Peter is in his late 80's and it is so important to try to ensure any doubt about his involvement in his wife's death is lifted before he passes away so that he can rein peace. Peter came home that day and found the dog in the garden and Ann on the floor in the lounge in a pool of blood wearing just her bikini top. Ann who was booked to attend a party that evening had been repeatedly and brutally stabbed to death. Police suggest that the suspect had planned to rape Ann as her bikini bottom had been removed but whether that was the intention or not of course we cannot confirm.

I mean however unlikely there is no evidence available to confirm that Ann was in fact wearing the bikini bottoms prior to the incident which lead to her death, although there would be no logical reason why she would not have.

Sadly due to misreporting by the media (as usual) it was suggested that Ann's killer was planning to rape her but if that was the case why didn't he go through with it? After all he was presumably alone with Ann and as according to the police there was no sign of any struggle inside the house or indeed outside, this of course indicates that there was a very good chance the killer was known to Ann, but who was he? 

30 years ago today 3rd August Ann's life was brought to an abrupt end seemingly without any reason or explanation. She was by all accounts a friendly lady, quite reserved and a mother that was very much loved so why would anyone take her life? Was this just an opportune killer who saw Ann sun bathing in the grounds of her home? If so then why no sign of any disturbance or of a fight? After all our natural human instinct when faced with danger is to fight or flee, neither of which seems to have happened on the hottest day of 1990. 

https://www.thenorthernecho.co.uk/news/18623640.ann-heron-murder-give-day-court-clear-name-says-husband-peter/

Ann's husband has today written to the police and challenged them to either look at the new evidence and clear his name completely or charge him again and give him his day in court to prove to the world that he had nothing to do with his wife's death. 

Peter said "You are innocent until proven guilty, but they never gave me the chance to prove I am innocent" He went on to say "I was guilty before I could be innocent"

I know it's a long time ago but I do urge anyone that may have any memories of 3rd August 1990 in or around Darlington in County Durham in particular the A67 between 4.30pm and 5,15pm to contact the police or indeed get in touch with The Northern Echo. 

I would like to take this opportunity to say that I do not believe this lady's murder to be in any way connected to Christopher Halliwell and I urge anyone looking at the case to focus on more recent evidence raised by private death investigator, Jen Jarvie which links the late Michael Benson to the case. Here is a picture of him taken from the 1990 BBC Crimewatch appeal when he was on the run from prison and said to have been driving a blue Ford Orion. . .

I wish Peter Heron the very best and sincerely hope that his name will soon be cleared and the truth finally told on this tragic case. 

Stay safe everyone, please do leave me a comment and don't forget to follow me on Twitter: https://twitter.com/adams_jarad or

Linkedin: https://www.linkedin.com/in/jarad-adams-8360751b4/

Useful Links: https://thetruecrimeenthusiast.co.uk/2017/07/18/the-beauty-in-the-bikini-murder/

                       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZyhXJ3dx3Ck

Update . . .

BBC News has today announced that a suspect has officially been put forward in this case by Jen Jarvie and now the family have high hopes that the case may at last be solved and most importantly the good name of Peter Heron be rightly cleared. 

I will bring updates as they come in, here is the link to the news article, stay safe

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-tees-53637276

Missing Andrew Gosden

https://www.missingpeople.org.uk/help-us-find/andrew-gosden-07-019198

Andrew Gosden went missing from his home in Doncaster, South Yorkshire on September 14th 2007, he was aged just 14 years old at the time. He withdrew £200 in cash from his bank account and bought a one-way ticket to London and simply vanished, ha has never been seen or heard of since.

Andrew was an extremely high achiever in school, particularly excelling in mathematics. Just a few weeks before he disappeared he had attended a summer school camp of some kind aimed at high achievers and in fact chose that over and above going on holiday in London. 

According to his father Kevin, Andrew had been very keen and excitable about the time that he had spent at 'The young gifted and talented programme'. Andrew merely saw school as something that had to be done in order to progress to adult life, so clearly, he was very keen to progress. Hardly the kind of lad to want to end his life in my humble opinion, so I feel suicide can be pretty much ruled out. 

As some of you that know me and follow me on Twitter I am a very suspicious minded person and when something lands at my door, no matter how old or how seemingly mundane I am not happy just to put it down if I feel there is more to it and that is most definitely the case here. This young the chap went missing in South Yorkshire, rocked up in London's busy Kings Cross then promptly vanished out of the sight of all that CCTV and millions of pairs of eyes, really? 

I am not convinced by the explanation that the police took too long to gather CCTV, whilst that may be true in part I am in no way satisfied that the very last camera sighting of a young lad, dressed in quite a unique way at a time of the day when kids would be at school quite adds up. To be fair it's not like he could pass for an 18-year-old, he was by his father's own admission of a younger appearance than his actual age. Why did the police take too long, if of course, that is true? Why was he not stopped by police or truancy officers in London, particularly bearing in mind there are schools quite close to Kings cross?

Yes I fully accept that the capital city is an extremely busy place with many, many tourists visiting every day but, surely a 14-year-old boy who looked more like 12 walking around the city centre alone should have drawn attention. After all, the city has many people rushing around it but it also has many police officers, security staff and huge amounts of operational CCTV watched by dedicated controllers constantly viewing it.

THE DAY ANDREW VANISHED

Friday, September 14th 2007 started much the same way as any other school day in the Gosden family home, except that Andrew was reportedly just a little more tired and irritable than normal, but nonetheless he got up for school and set off on time, calling "see you later" as he set off out at around 0805. That's where things took their first turn as Andrew did not set off towards the school bus, but instead went to the park just down the road and waited for his parents and sister to leave the house. 

Immediately a question comes to mind, although it may be irrelevant; Why did Andrew and his sister, 2 years his senior not head out to school together? I've not seen any explanation but I do wonder if they attended the same school, surely they must have, but maybe not. I have not been able to ascertain what school Andrew's sister attended but I do know that he attended McCauley catholic high school

Moving on

So, Andrew sets off as normal, no signs of anything wrong were noticed by the family, but there was something wrong wasn't there? This young lad with a 100% attendance record at school goes and hides out in a park, never even heading for school and clearly no intention of attending. 25 minutes later he's been back home, changed his clothes from school uniform to every day casual and headed out for the last time. Nobody saw this youngster to really notice him, hardly observant or conscientious in South Yorkshire then. Did nobody walk through the park at that time of the day, maybe on their way to work, school or maybe to the shops? Nobody thought it a little odd to see a boy in school uniform sat in a park? Did no one approach Andrew? Ask if he was OK and why he was not on his way to school? 

The teenager then headed out to the cashpoint, passing a neighbour's CCTV, where he withdrew £200 from his bank account then headed to the station where he insisted on purchasing a one-way ticket to London despite being advised that he could buy a return for literally just a few pence more. He would have had around £130 left after the ticket so a few pence more would not have made any difference. Seemingly 14-year-old Andrew either had a plan of how he would return home which failed or he had no intention of returning. Now let's look carefully here. . .

Andrew was an above average, highly educated boy always keen to learn new things, so it stands to reason that he would have known that he would be seen by the neighbouring house CCTV and would almost certainly be seen hiding out on a bench in a park, but did nothing to conceal his movements or take another route perhaps? He grew up in that area so he would have almost certainly have had an idea of other people's movements around him and the likelihood of being observed.

I digress for a moment as at this point, a very important observation was made by the local / family vicar Reverend Alan Murray. The vicar knew Andrew very well as the family were regulars at the church, although Andrew had stopped attending a year before he vanished. The vicar was actually invited to dinner at the Gosden home on the very evening that Andrew disappeared. Reverend Murray states that he saw Andrew in the park on September 14th but did not pay attention and went on his way, only later thinking that Andrew's behaviour was a little out of character when he received the news that the boy had in fact gone missing.

Now I don't want to be accused of slander or of pointing the finger at all but let's just take a glance at the facts here: Andrew had a 100% school attendance record, he had NEVER bunked off school at all, not once and the school bus and route to school lay in the opposite direction to the park, obviously the family vicar knew all of this.

Reverend Murray had telephone numbers for Andrew's parents but he 'never gave it much thought' and went upon his merry way. I really do find that a little hard to accept, so I am left to ask the question as to why. Having studied many articles, watched documentaries and You-tube videos, I've learnt a lot but I can't help feeling that there is so much more that should be said, many questions simply remain unanswered.

I have even taken the trouble to carefully study many posts and discussions on the Reddit website with so many lovely people going over various thoughts on the case. Some people would class the users of sites such as Reddit as "armchair detectives" but I personally find their points help me to understand and consider stories such as this one in more depth. Many of them are not in any way qualified but they take the time and use their abilities to really think even the smallest point through and analyse it carefully. In my opinion, it is often the smaller points that make such a difference to a case.

Let's take the usual route and consider as much as we can in this case, please do read on. . .

Fourteen-year-old Andrew got up on the morning of September 14th 2007 obviously planning to leave his home and head to London, was he going to sneak off to a concert of one of his favourite rock bands? No, I just don't feel that explanation is right, why? Well . . .

Andrew was very happy going to school as he saw education as important and had an absolutely 100% attendance record, his father even said that Andrew had never even taken a day off sick with flu or a cold. I have previously mentioned that Andrew had chosen to attend an educational high achievers summer camp during the summer holidays rather than go on a trip to London to visit his grandparents when he could have easily gone to a concert or two, so why sneak off? That added with the fact he purchased a one-way ticket to London not a return really makes me see things differently.

I am almost convinced that when Andrew Gosden boarded the train that September day, he knew there was no plan to return home but, one small thing makes me unsure and that is that he left over a hundred pounds in his room, surely he would have taken it to use. There is one possible explanation there and that is that he believed he was going somewhere and maybe with somebody where he would not need money. 

I feel at the juncture it's quite important to ask a rather obvious question. . .So picture this scenario; You are working in the ticket office at the railway station, it is a school day and a 14-year-old boy that looks younger appears alone and requests to purchase a One-way ticket to travel alone some 170 miles. Would you not question this? Why is he not at school? Where are his parents or guardian? Where has he got such a large amount of money? Furthermore, this small boy is adamant that he only wants a one-way journey, would you not ask questions and raise the alarm, maybe contact the British Transport Police? Surely it is obvious there is something that is abnormal about this, would you not have confirmed the child's safety? I know I definitely would have done. 

There have been many theories put forward about Andrew's reason for disappearing including a suggestion that he ran away to commit suicide but I really don't accept that at all. I mean why would a teenager travel all those miles to end his life? Surely there would have been many places where he could have simply vanished and killed himself locally to his home. Also as previously mentioned he withdrew some £200 from his bank leaving it almost empty when he only needed approximately £70 to travel to London so why take the rest if he simply intended to commit suicide? In my mind, that theory is dismissed.

Just as recently as March 2020 Andrew's anguished dad Kevin Gosden spoke to Examiner Live and explained that every day is still a real struggle for him and the family as they simply have no reason for his son's disappearance and no leads as to his whereabouts or what has become of him. You can read that article below.

https://www.examinerlive.co.uk/news/local-news/dad-missing-doncaster-teenager-andrew-17902519

Kevin is still desperate to get even the tiniest piece of information that could lead to him knowing what happened to his son Andrew and ultimately if he is still alive. I will say at this point I think that the young man is still alive but, that is only a personal 'gut' feeling, I have not been shown any evidence to truly suggest either way. The more that I think on this case and the more that I research the more I am convinced that London was never Andrew's intended final destination, in fact I feel that the boy was clever enough to buy a ticket there to make everyone look for him there. 

I look at his face and cannot help thinking "Here is a lad that is very clever for his age" He would have worked out everything meticulously I am sure and had everything planned. He apparently wasn't very smart when it came to everyday stuff like packing things to travel with but, he travelled to London alone having carefully thought out his going out as normal, hiding out in a park, coming back and even laying somewhat a cold trail in the family home. 

This boy dressed in school uniform, went back home put everything in its usual place in order not to raise the alarm any earlier than absolutely necessary. I highlight this as I feel it to be a very relevant part of Andrew's plan. To be fair if he had not gone through the usual process of hanging his blazer on the back of the chair and putting his uniform into the washing machine his family would have wondered why and looked for him probably as much as two and a half hours earlier than they did.

There has at one stage been an online contact with a young man identifying as "Roo" which was Andrew's childhood nickname. In this contact, he apparently told a man that he had no bank account as he had left home at age fourteen. How accurate this lead is I would not like to speculate but once again IF this was Andrew then "Roo" told the man that he was in Lincoln and I wouldn't mind betting that he was nowhere near there as he knew that if this man raised the alarm the Gosden family and the police would go looking for him there and of course they did. 

The family received the news that "Roo" had been in contact with someone online and had said he was in Lincoln, they took themselves there and spent time driving around the streets, handing out flyers and talking to people but of course, the search lead to nothing and the trail once again went cold.

Now; One point that I really believe holds a lot of relevance yet it seems neither the police nor the Gosden Family really pursued is the potential male witness that went to Enterprise Way Police Station in Leominster, Herefordshire. Unfortunately, when the "witness" arrived at the police station he found it closed and used an intercom to communicate with HQ and said that he had information in connection with Andrew's disappearance and that he had seen him in Shrewsbury. Sadly by the time, a police officer arrived to speak to the man he had vanished into the night.

The same man is believed to have written to The BBC since that time with the same information saying that was pretty certain that he had seen Andrew Gosden in Shrewsbury and apparently West Yorkshire police were liaising with local police to follow things up. The story featured on the BBC Spotlight programme on 26th November 2008 but unlike London and Lincoln there is no suggestion that the Gosdens went to Shrewsbury or indeed did any campaigning there, which strikes me as a little odd, I guess we can only wonder why. 

https://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theoneshow/consumer/2008/11/26/missing_at_christmas.html

I can well believe that Andrew reads all the articles written about him and watches the many videos and knows that he left for a reason, but that is the massive question which if answered would in my belief lead to Andrew being found. . .Why did 14-year old Andrew Gosden leave home?

The picture above indicates what Andrew may look like today if you know anything at all or indeed Andrew if you are reading this and even if you don't want to be found just contact someone and let them know you are safe

Here is the official family website http://helpustofindandrew.weebly.com/

Remember Andrew has a very unusual ear :